CO129-214 - Public Offices & Others - 1883 — Page 769

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Suggestive on 17/470. as to the charabus

ffie in

7065101

should be carried out

I notice that

Dreams

in the Blue Book

the

Comet Honor"

is given

as one

Emoluments

?

To M. Round

In Meade

the

the frown licitor.

C-P.L·

20.Oct.

Micrate

The existing Hongkong pension does not explicitly exclude from superannuation officers who have been allowed private practice; but you know the Treasury has enforced the rule both at home & abroad in cases where it has not been explicitly laid down.

As regards Hongkong, I have looked into old papers and find that as long ago as 1862

An

refused the

Attorney General the privilege of contributing

to the superannuation fund on the ground that officers with private practice had no claim to superannuation. After the introduction of Imperial legislation of 1859, when superannuation abatements were also abolished in most of the Crown Colonies, Sir H. Robinson asked leave

753

to frame rules which should in future govern all pension cases chargeable to Hongkong Funds. The Treasury agreed to this in a letter which dealt with a good many other points, and incidentally showed that

bar to superannuation

private practice

was a

Sir H. Robinson then sent home the

6628/62 draft of the existing pension minutes,

in his despatch remarked that there were 3 professional officers - the Attorney General, the Chief Medical Officer, and the Purveyor General, to whom he proposed to allow a professional addition because they had

private practice, but he argued in spite of the general Treasury rule that these Officers should have some pensions; this was supported by the C.O. (see Lord Blachford's

8938/62 minute), and agreed to by the Treasury in their reply to the Governor's despatch. Dreams reply contains nothing specific

as to the claims of any other officers in the Colony who might be allowed private practice, from which it might be inferred either that there were none, or that it was an rule that they were not entitled to

a

a claim to pension - that it certainly was not, that there

nothing to exempt excepting.

Ax7

Edit History

2026-05-24 06:36:01 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
Suggestive on 17/470. as to the charabus ffie in 7065101 should be carried out I notice that Dreams in the Blue Book the Comet Honor" is given as one Emoluments ? To M. Round In Meade the the frown licitor. C-P.L· 20.Oct. Micrate The existing Hongkong pension does not explicitly exclude from superannuation officers who have been allowed private practice; but you know the Treasury has enforced the rule both at home & abroad in cases where it has not been explicitly laid down. As regards Hongkong, I have looked into old papers and find that as long ago as 1862 An refused the Attorney General the privilege of contributing to the superannuation fund on the ground that officers with private practice had no claim to superannuation. After the introduction of Imperial legislation of 1859, when superannuation abatements were also abolished in most of the Crown Colonies, Sir H. Robinson asked leave 753 to frame rules which should in future govern all pension cases chargeable to Hongkong Funds. The Treasury agreed to this in a letter which dealt with a good many other points, and incidentally showed that bar to superannuation private practice was a Sir H. Robinson then sent home the 6628/62 draft of the existing pension minutes, in his despatch remarked that there were 3 professional officers - the Attorney General, the Chief Medical Officer, and the Purveyor General, to whom he proposed to allow a professional addition because they had private practice, but he argued in spite of the general Treasury rule that these Officers should have some pensions; this was supported by the C.O. (see Lord Blachford's 8938/62 minute), and agreed to by the Treasury in their reply to the Governor's despatch. Dreams reply contains nothing specific as to the claims of any other officers in the Colony who might be allowed private practice, from which it might be inferred either that there were none, or that it was an rule that they were not entitled to a a claim to pension - that it certainly was not, that there nothing to exempt excepting. Ax7
Baseline (Original)
Suggestive on 17/470. as to the charabus ffie in 7065101 should be carried out I notice that Dreams in the Blue Book the Comet Honor" is given as one Emoluments ? To M. Round In Meade the the frown licitor. C-P.L· 20.Oct. Micrate The Ixisting Angkang pension does not explicitly excluch from properannuation officers Who have to been allowed private practice; but you know the Treasury has enforced the sile both at home & abroad in cases where ithe, not been explicitly laid down. As regards Hongkong thave looked int basions old papers find that as long ago as to by An refused the Attorney Gener ( was privilege of contributing to the Experannuation found on the ground that officers with private practice had no claim to superannuation. After the intraduct Imperial legislation of 1859, when superanization abatements were also abolished. in most of the Crown Colonies, his H. Robinson asked leave 753 to frame miles which should infuture. Joven all pension cases chargable in Houghing Funds - The Treasury agreed to this kin letter which dealt with a good many other points, Kincidentally shaved theat bar to superannuation. private practice was a Sir H. Robinson then sent home the 6628/62 draft of the caisting pension minats, tin his despatch remarked that there were 3 professional officers the Altung, General the Chiefpledical Officer - vthe Purveyor Gant, to whom he propond to allow to professional addition because they had private practice but he argued in thite of the general treasury rule that ther Officers should have some pensions; this was supported by the (.0. (see hord Blachandis agreed to by the treasury- Mither the Governor's despatch. Dreams riply, contain anything opecific as to the claims of any other files in the Colony who might be allowed private practice from which it might be inferred citter that there were nome, or that it was an rule that they were not appointments pinig 8938/62 minute), twas nor thic understand a a clain to pension - that it certainly wa hit, that there nothing intermit exccepting. Ax7
2026-05-24 06:36:01 · Baseline
View content

Suggestive on 17/470. as to the charabus

ffie in

7065101

should be carried out

I notice that

Dreams

in the Blue Book

the

Comet Honor"

is given

as one

Emoluments

?

To M. Round

In Meade

the

the frown licitor.

C-P.L·

20.Oct.

Micrate

The Ixisting Angkang pension does not explicitly excluch from properannuation officers Who have to been allowed private practice; but you know the Treasury has enforced the sile both at home & abroad in cases where ithe, not been explicitly laid down.

As regards Hongkong

thave looked int

basions old papers find that as long ago as to by

An

refused the

Attorney Gener ( was privilege of contributing

to the Experannuation found on the ground that officers with private practice had no claim to superannuation. After the intraduct Imperial legislation of 1859, when superanization abatements were also abolished. in most of the Crown Colonies, his H. Robinson asked leave

753

to frame miles which should infuture. Joven all pension cases chargable in Houghing

Funds - The Treasury agreed to this kin letter which dealt with a good many other points, Kincidentally shaved theat

bar to superannuation.

private practice

was a

Sir H. Robinson then sent home the

6628/62 draft of the caisting pension minats,

tin his despatch remarked that there were 3 professional officers the Altung, General the Chiefpledical Officer - vthe Purveyor Gant, to whom he propond to allow to professional addition because they had

• private practice but he argued in thite of the general treasury rule that ther Officers should have some pensions; this was supported by the (.0. (see hord Blachandis

agreed to by the treasury- Mither the Governor's despatch. Dreams riply, contain anything opecific

as to the claims of any other files in the Colony who might be allowed private practice from which it might be inferred citter that there were nome, or that it was an rule that they were not appointments pinig

8938/62 minute), twas

nor thic

understand

a

a clain to pension - that it certainly wa hit, that there

nothing intermit exccepting.

Ax7

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.